Savings endowments
Do you deal with customer complaints about savings endowments? This page will give you an overview of the complaints we deal with and how we approach them.
On this page
Do you have an investments complaint?
If you’re a consumer, see our investment guidance for consumers. Or give us a call on 0800 023 4567.
Complaints we deal with
Most of the complaints we see about saving endowments involve:
- ten-year savings plans
- endowment savings plans
- maximum investment plans
Rules on savings endowments
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) lists savings endowments among financial products covered by the reporting requirement in SUP 16.11.
You may also wish to see the FCA’s guidance on:
If you've given advice on savings endowments, you should also consider the FCA's rules on suitability in COBS 9A.1 Application and purpose.
Handling savings endowments complaints before they come to us
Good complaint handling can repair a relationship, help build trust and confidence in financial services, and give customers a better understanding of your financial products.
You should ensure your complaint handling teams fully understand:
- The requirements of the Consumer Duty
- What to send us when we're dealing with a complaint about your firm
Our decisions database holds all the final decisions we’ve published since 1 April 2013. They're anonymised to protect the identity of complainants but are based on real-life complaints, so will give you a good picture of how we resolve disputes.
Our complaints data will give you an idea of the volume of complaints we receive and resolve, and the proportion that we have upheld in consumers’ favour.
How we resolve savings endowment complaints
We only look at complaints you've had an opportunity to look into first. If the consumer is unhappy with your decision, or you don't respond to them within the time limits, they can come to us.
Each case is different, so what we require will vary, but we’ll look at the facts and evidence from both you and your customer. What we consider will usually include:
- relevant laws and regulations
- regulators’ rules in place when the event happened, including the Consumer Duty [link]
- guidance, standards and codes of practice in place at the time of the event
We follow the FCA’s dispute resolution rules (DISP) and will take into account how you’ve tried to put things right. We’ll also consider whether the sale was by a 'tied' representative of a product provider, or an independent financial adviser.
If we uphold a consumer's complaint, we'll tell you what you need to do to put things right.
Examples of complaints we investigate include:
- the policy hasn’t returned enough to make it worthwhile
- charges, such as the cost of life cover, were too high
- there was a reduction in yield
- the premiums collected by an agent from the customer's home were too high
What we look at will depend on what kind of endowment the complaint is about. We’ll usually consider whether the policy was suitable for the customer in the first place.
-
Sometimes, the customer complains about the amount the policy has returned, but the more significant issue is the suitability of the plan. So we’ll start by checking that the policy was suited to the customer's needs.
Many customers who’ve taken out endowment plans will be considered ‘low risk’, but they should have been classed as ‘risk averse’.
We’ll also consider what the customer might have done with their money if they hadn’t taken out the savings plan. If we’re satisfied the policy wasn’t suitable as a general savings vehicle for the customer, we’re likely to uphold the complaint.
Special rules apply to plans sold by independent financial advisers. So we consider the individual circumstances for each of these.
-
If we believe your customer did, or should have, understood that the sale was execution only, we’re unlikely to uphold the complaint. But we still need to be confident that your customer made an informed decision.
In these cases, we'll want to look at sales and marketing material, such as mailshots and illustrations to check the information provided was clear, fair and wasn't misleading.
All marketing materials must present balanced information. The sale will be in question if the execution was based on inadequate or misleading information.
Read more about how we assess the suitability of an investment.
-
In complaints about 'reduction in yield', we’d expect you to provide or recreate an illustration from the point of sale. This is to show the projected return of the plan after the cost of life cover and any charges have been applied.
If you can't provide an illustration, we may ask you for information about the costs of the plan. We’ll take these costs into account, along with other relevant information, to see if we think the plan offered a realistic prospect of a reasonable return.
If the illustration showed the return would be less or only slightly more than the amount to be paid into the plan, we’ll look at whether the customer understood this when they took out the plan. If your firm didn't discuss this with the customer, we’re unlikely to agree that it was clear, even if it was shown on an illustration.
Customers are unlikely to choose an investment if they know they’ll be getting back less than they paid in. If we believe your firm didn't make this clear to the customer, we’re likely to say the plan was unsuitable.
We’ll consider any reasons why someone would choose to invest in a plan that would return less than if they’d kept their money in the bank – assuming reasonable growth. And we’ll decide if the customer had lost out financially by taking out the plan.
Because the plan proceeds are paid to the customer without any tax liability, we’ll look at the total return to the customer. That means it might be appropriate to look at the gross return received. This is relevant when the customer is a higher-rate taxpayer.
-
Sometimes charges, such as the cost of life cover, affect the final return on the savings endowment. And charges tend to be higher for older customers.
In some cases, the deduction might make a significant difference to the return when the customer didn't even need life cover. So, we’ll check carefully whether the customer did need life assurance, by looking closely at what was discussed when they took out the plan.
If we think the customer needed life cover, we’ll work what percentage of the premium it was. We may still uphold a complaint even if this percentage is very small.
It may be the cost of the life assurance is not to blame for the low returns. If so, we’ll look at other charges on the savings endowment and whether they made the plan unsuitable.
-
Your firm may operate 'industrial branch sales' – where an agent regularly collects the premiums for the policy from a customer's home.
To resolve these cases, we’ll need to carefully consider what the customer understood at the time they bought the savings endowment policy. If the agent was selling door to door – and the plan is different to the one sold in your branch or from your office – this is especially true.
Case study
Delay in proceeds of policy being paid
Endowments
Business Support Hub
Businesses and consumer advisers can contact our Business Support Hub on 020 7964 1400 for information on how we might look at a particular complaint, or for guidance on our rules and how we work.
We also work with businesses and other organisations to help prevent complaints.